Feature
Universal health care may drive the vote in Puerto Rico
An alliance between two political parties in Puerto Rico is challenging politics as usual with a progressive touchstone: establishing a single-payer health care system for the archipelago’s 3.2 million residents.
Leading the movement is Juan Dalmau Ramírez, an attorney and former local senator who is making his third run for governor, now as the nominee of the alliance between the Puerto Rico Independence Party (known as PIP) and the Citizen’s Victory Movement. His vision, he told Harvard Public Health, is about “looking to remove private insurers as intermediaries from the health care system in Puerto Rico.” (The candidate is not related to the author of this piece.)
Sign up for Harvard Public Health
Delivered to your inbox weekly.
Dalmau is troubled that even with a health care budget of $6.6 billion—the largest area of spending in Puerto Rico’s budget—people still have difficulty accessing health services. Health systems experts say patients must wait months for critical appointments, providers are often far from where they live, and health insurance doesn’t fully cover their costs.
Nearly 70 percent of Puerto Ricans rely on Medicaid, Medicare, or CHIP for their health coverage, which is managed by the Puerto Rico Health Insurance Administration, part of the islands’ public health department. That public infrastructure contracts all care out to managed care organizations—which have been shown to deny treatments.
Dalmau’s party proposes to combine these federal funds with money from Puerto Rico’s general budget and cut insurers out of the publicly funded system. The proposal would create a National Health Insurance Corporation, organized as a cooperative where the policyholders, beneficiaries, and the government of Puerto Rico would be members and shareholders.
Dalmau also wants to see greater attention to primary care and more focus on nutrition and physical activity; he hopes a shift toward prevention could help reduce rates of chronic disease in Puerto Rico, where chronic disease rates are among the highest in the U.S., according to the Center for Disease Control’s Behavior Risk Surveillance System.
Alexandra Rivera-González, a professor who studies health systems at the University of California Merced Health Science Research Institute, says single-payer programs have been part of the political conversation in Puerto Rico for years. What makes Dalmau’s proposal different, she says, is its foundation in research and expert consultation. “It’s bringing a holistic perspective to the restructuring of the health care system,” she says.
A major problem any health care initiative must address is attrition. More than 8,000 doctors closed their medical practice in Puerto Rico from 2009 to 2022, according to the Puerto Rico Health Depart. Many of them are leaving Puerto Rico for opportunities in the United Sates that offer better pay, less bureaucracy, or better working conditions.
Heriberto Marín Centeno, an economist and professor at the University of Puerto Rico’s School of Public Health, says considering these points of friction was central for him and other authors of the PIP’s health care proposal. Much of the funds spent in the current system “are being diverted as administrative expenses and as profits for the insurance companies,” he says. “A significant portion of the resources … could be used to treat the health of the population—to pay for the services of our health professionals and our providers,” he says. PIP’s proposal would require that 95 percent of the corporations’ revenue be used to pay for direct medical services. (In 2022, the amount of money spent on direct medical services was under 89%.)
Polls show the alliance has the best chance yet of winning the governor’s race, with Dalmau in the running as the PIP candidate. A poll two weeks ago from El Nuevo Día, Puerto Rico’s largest newspaper, shows him in second place—the first time in history the two main parties aren’t leading in the polls. Universal health care often features in alliance candidates’ stump speeches. Perhaps this is not surprising: One survey by a progressive polling firm found 46 percent of Puerto Ricans named health care as their top concern, and 62 percent support Medicare for All (which is very similar to the alliance’s proposal).
A single-payer health plan may not be as controversial in Puerto Rico as in other parts of the United States. After all, the island actually had a socialized care system up until 1993. As Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s administration explored universal health care options, Puerto Rico seized the moment to build a public health infrastructure, according to Carlo Bosques Casillas, a medical student who collaborated on the PIP’s health care proposal and who founded Proyecto Arbona, an initiative to teach medical students about the history of health care in Puerto Rico.
Roosevelt developed a close relationship with Luis Muñoz Marín, a Puerto Rican politician who became the island’s first democratically elected governor in 1949 and held the office for the next 16 years. Marín introduced a regionalized universal health care system in 1957, which became known as the “Arbona System” after Guillermo Arbona, the secretary of health who developed it. Modeled on England’s National Health Service, the government owned Puerto Rico’s hospitals and other health care infrastructure.
The Arbona System focused heavily on preventive care to control infectious diseases. Each of the 78 municipalities in Puerto Rico had at least one Center of Diagnosis and Treatment, clinics that were patients’ first point of health systems contact and offered immunizations, medical evaluations, basic treatments, and interventions for minor medical emergencies. There were also 12 regional hospitals. More specialized care was given in medical centers in major cities, in particular Centro Médico, which continues to be Puerto Rico’s largest hospital. These three levels of facilities meant that people always had clinics nearby, and the care was free for all.
The Arbona System started to run into problems in 1965 when the United States passed legislation to offer Medicare and Medicaid, Bosques says. Medicaid capped the funds available to the Arbona System, and it expanded the private health sector. By 1970, there was a marked division between the private and public health system—a change whose effects were felt over the coming years.
By 1979, political leaders had begun to privatize the system. By 1993, the Arbona System was in tatters, and then-governor Pedro Roselló set up the current system, in which government funds pay for private health insurance plans.
Dalmau and his Alliance are proposing a single-payer system rather than the socialized program of the Arbona System. A government insurance plan would cover all Puerto Ricans’ medical costs—much like the “Medicare for All” proposals in the continental United States, and the way the Canada’s system operates—but Puerto Rico would not own the health infrastructure. (Individuals could still purchase private, supplemental coverage.)
If Dalmau is elected, his health plan will still face challenges. His alliance will need a legislative majority—which is a real possibility for the first time—and he will face a big fight from the health insurance industry, which would effectively be shut out of managing government funded health care plans by this proposal. (The Medicaid and Medicare Advantage Products Association, a nonprofit made up of private corporations offering private plans funded by Medicaid and Medicare, declined to comment on the proposal.)
And Dalmau will also need approval from Washington, which may be a tall order because Puerto Rico has no vote in Congress, and Republicans are attacking Vice President Kamala Harris over her past support for Medicare for All. Whether Harris or former President Donald Trump wins in November, the politics around this kind of single-payer proposal could be complicated.
But Dalmau thinks the time has come.
“We cannot continue with a model that failed and is copied from the U.S. system where health care is run for profit,” he said at a forum hosted by the Association of Puerto Rican Hospitals earlier this month. “That is not being anti-American, pro-independence, [or] socialist. … We can’t have insurance companies deciding who lives and who dies in this country.”
Carlos Berrios Polanco supported in the reporting of this story.
Republish this article
<p>U.S. regulations once undid Puerto Rico's first pass at universal care. A new political alliance gives it another chance.</p>
<p>Written by Camille Padilla Dalmau</p>
<p>This <a rel="canonical" href="https://harvardpublichealth.org/policy-practice/universal-healthcare-may-drive-vote-puerto-rico/">article</a> originally appeared in<a href="https://harvardpublichealth.org/">Harvard Public Health magazine</a>. Subscribe to their <a href="https://harvardpublichealth.org/subscribe/">newsletter</a>.</p>
<p class="is-style-t-caption"><em>This story is a copublication with </em>9 Millones<em>, an independent platform for community-driven journalism in Puerto Rico. You can read their Spanish-language version of this story <a href="https://www.9millones.com/story/puede-la-salud-universal-aumentar-el-apoyo-a-juan-dalmau-y-la-alianza" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">here</a>.</em></p>
<p class="has-drop-cap">An alliance between two political parties in Puerto Rico is challenging politics as usual with a progressive touchstone: establishing a single-payer health care system for the archipelago’s 3.2 million residents.</p>
<p>Leading the movement is Juan Dalmau Ramírez, an attorney and former local senator who is making his third run for governor, now as the nominee of the alliance between the Puerto Rico Independence Party (known as PIP) and the Citizen’s Victory Movement. His vision, he told <em>Harvard Public Health</em>, is about “looking to remove private insurers as intermediaries from the health care system in Puerto Rico.” (The candidate is not related to the author of this piece.)</p>
<p>Dalmau is troubled that even with a health care budget of <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1h_di1gJQaAkRZEHXLShcF1IqN7hNf4pF/view" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">$6.6 billion</a>—the largest area of spending in Puerto Rico’s budget—people still have difficulty accessing health services. Health systems experts say patients must wait months for critical appointments, providers are often far from where they live, and health insurance <a href="https://www.amjmed.com/article/S0002-9343(16)30856-7/pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">doesn’t fully cover their costs</a>.</p>
<p>Nearly 70 percent of Puerto Ricans rely on Medicaid, Medicare, or CHIP for their health coverage, which is managed by the Puerto Rico Health Insurance Administration, part of the islands’ public health department. That public infrastructure contracts all care out to managed care organizations—which have been shown to <a href="https://periodismoinvestigativo.com/2022/08/patients-in-the-dark-about-the-performance-of-their-health-insurance-plans/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">deny treatments</a>.</p>
<p>Dalmau’s party proposes to combine these federal funds with money from Puerto Rico’s general budget and cut insurers out of the publicly funded system. The proposal would create a National Health Insurance Corporation, organized as a cooperative where the policyholders, beneficiaries, and the government of Puerto Rico would be members and shareholders.</p>
<p>Dalmau also wants to see greater attention to primary care and more focus on nutrition and physical activity; he hopes a shift toward prevention could help reduce rates of chronic disease in Puerto Rico, where chronic disease rates are among the highest in the U.S., according to the Center for Disease Control’s Behavior Risk Surveillance System.</p>
<p>Alexandra Rivera-González, a professor who studies health systems at the University of California Merced Health Science Research Institute, says single-payer programs have been part of the political conversation in Puerto Rico for years. What makes Dalmau’s proposal different, she says, is its foundation in research and expert consultation. “It’s bringing a holistic perspective to the restructuring of the health care system,” she says.</p>
<p>A major problem any health care initiative must address is attrition. More than <a href="https://grupocne.org/2023/03/05/exodus-of-doctors-a-problem-that-defies-simple-solutions/#:~:text=According%2520to%2520Health%2520Department%2520officials,little%2520more%2520than%2520one%2520decade." target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">8,000 </a>doctors closed their medical practice in Puerto Rico from 2009 to 2022, according to the Puerto Rico Health Depart. Many of them are leaving Puerto Rico for <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590229624000091" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">opportunities in the United Sates</a> that offer better pay, less bureaucracy, or better working conditions.</p>
<p>Heriberto Marín Centeno, an economist and professor at the University of Puerto Rico’s School of Public Health, says considering these points of friction was central for him and other authors of the <a href="https://www.patrianuevapr.com/_files/ugd/1df250_dddb9b00485040578929d2f496f9e7db.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">PIP’s health care proposal</a>. Much of the funds spent in the current system “are being diverted as administrative expenses and as profits for the insurance companies,” he says. “A significant portion of the resources … could be used to treat the health of the population—to pay for the services of our health professionals and our providers,” he says. PIP’s proposal would require that 95 percent of the corporations’ revenue be used to pay for direct medical services. (In 2022, the amount of money spent on direct medical services was under <a href="https://docs.pr.gov/files/OCS/informe-anual/2022/1.%2520Informe%2520Anual%25202022.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">89%</a>.)</p>
<p>Polls show the alliance has the best chance yet of winning the governor’s race, with Dalmau in the running as the PIP candidate. A poll two weeks ago from <em>El Nuevo Día,</em> Puerto Rico’s largest newspaper, <a href="https://www.elnuevodia.com/english/news/story/who-would-win-the-governorship-if-the-election-were-held-today-la-encuesta-reveals-a-new-political-game/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">shows him in second place</a>—the first time in history the two main parties aren’t leading in the polls. Universal health care often features in alliance candidates’ stump speeches. Perhaps this is not surprising: One survey by a progressive polling firm found 46 percent of Puerto Ricans named health care as their top concern, and 62 percent support Medicare for All (which is very similar to the alliance’s proposal).</p>
<p>A single-payer health plan may not be as controversial in Puerto Rico as in other parts of the United States. After all, the island actually had a socialized care system up until 1993. As <a href="https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1314&context=gc_etds" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s administration explored </a>universal health care options, Puerto Rico seized the moment to build a public health infrastructure, according to Carlo Bosques Casillas, a medical student who collaborated on the PIP’s health care proposal and who founded <a href="https://proyectoarbona.wixsite.com/proyectoarbona?fbclid=PAZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAaZSnoQvf8WRWhVVPqOWVlEMa6sMnQKiYldsf38_-DwlV0F2AoZ_bTe3XMo_aem_P7sE1G7D-eC4Wy6A7J9GJQ" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Proyecto Arbona</a>, an initiative to teach medical students about the history of health care in Puerto Rico.</p>
<p>Roosevelt developed a close relationship with Luis Muñoz Marín, a Puerto Rican politician who became the island’s first <a href="https://www.britannica.com/biography/Luis-Munoz-Marin" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">democratically elected governor </a>in 1949 and held the office for the next 16 years. Marín introduced a <a href="https://www.galenusrevista.com/El-Dr-John-B-Grant-y-el-Dr-Guillermo-Arbona/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">regionalized universal health care</a> system in 1957, which became known as the “Arbona System” after Guillermo Arbona, the secretary of health who developed it. Modeled on England’s National Health Service, the government owned Puerto Rico’s hospitals and other health care infrastructure.</p>
<p>The Arbona System <a href="https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/87011/2001050-puerto-rico-health-care-infratructure-assessment-site-visit-report_1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">focused heavily on preventive care</a> to control infectious diseases. Each of the 78 municipalities in Puerto Rico had at least one Center of Diagnosis and Treatment, clinics that were patients’ first point of health systems contact and offered immunizations, medical evaluations, basic treatments, and interventions for minor medical emergencies. There were also <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdfEZb0gsCc" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">12 regional hospitals</a>. More specialized care was given in medical centers in major cities, in particular Centro Médico, which continues to be Puerto Rico’s largest hospital. These three levels of facilities meant that people always had clinics nearby, and the care was free for all.</p>
<p>The Arbona System started to run into problems in 1965 when the United States passed legislation to offer Medicare and Medicaid, Bosques says. Medicaid capped the funds available to the Arbona System, and it <a href="https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/87011/2001050-puerto-rico-health-care-infratructure-assessment-site-visit-report_1.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">expanded the private health sector</a>. By 1970, there was a marked division between the private and public health system—a change whose effects were felt over the coming years.</p>
<p>By 1979, political leaders had begun to privatize the system. By 1993, the Arbona System was in tatters, and then-governor Pedro Roselló set up the current system, in which government funds pay for private health insurance plans.</p>
<p>Dalmau and his Alliance are proposing a single-payer system rather than the socialized program of the Arbona System. A government insurance plan would cover all Puerto Ricans' medical costs—much like the “Medicare for All” proposals in the continental United States, and the way the Canada’s system operates—but Puerto Rico <a href="https://www.patrianuevapr.com/salud" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">would not</a> own the health infrastructure. (Individuals could still purchase private, supplemental coverage.)</p>
<p>If Dalmau is elected, his health plan will still face challenges. His alliance will need a legislative majority—which is a real possibility for the first time—and he will face a big fight from the health insurance industry, which would effectively be shut out of managing government funded health care plans by this proposal. (The Medicaid and Medicare Advantage Products Association, a nonprofit made up of private corporations offering private plans funded by Medicaid and Medicare, declined to comment on the proposal.)</p>
<p>And Dalmau will also need approval from Washington, which may be a tall order because Puerto Rico has no vote in Congress, and Republicans are attacking Vice President Kamala Harris over her past support for Medicare for All. Whether Harris or former President Donald Trump wins in November, the politics around this kind of single-payer proposal could be complicated.</p>
<p>But Dalmau thinks the time has come.</p>
<p class=" t-has-endmark t-has-endmark">“We cannot continue with a model that failed and is copied from the U.S. system where health care is run for profit,” he said at a forum hosted by the Association of Puerto Rican Hospitals earlier this month. “That is not being anti-American, pro-independence, [or] socialist. … We can’t have insurance companies deciding who lives and who dies in this country.”</p>
<p><em>Carlos Berrios Polanco supported in the reporting of this story.</em></p>
<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-S1L5BS4DJN"></script>
<script>
window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
if (typeof gtag !== "function") {function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}}
gtag('js', new Date());
gtag('config', 'G-S1L5BS4DJN');
</script>
Republishing guidelines
We’re happy to know you’re interested in republishing one of our stories. Please follow the guidelines below, adapted from other sites, primarily ProPublica’s Steal Our Stories guidelines (we didn’t steal all of its republishing guidelines, but we stole a lot of them). We also borrowed from Undark and KFF Health News.
Timeframe: Most stories and opinion pieces on our site can be republished within 90 days of posting. An article is available for republishing if our “Republish” button appears next to the story. We follow the Creative Commons noncommercial no-derivatives license.
When republishing a Harvard Public Health story, please follow these rules and use the required acknowledgments:
- Do not edit our stories, except to reflect changes in time (for instance, “last week” may replace “yesterday”), make style updates (we use serial commas; you may choose not to), and location (we spell out state names; you may choose not to).
- Include the author’s byline.
- Include text at the top of the story that says, “This article was originally published by Harvard Public Health. You must link the words “Harvard Public Health” to the story’s original/canonical URL.
- You must preserve the links in our stories, including our newsletter sign-up language and link.
- You must use our analytics tag: a single pixel and a snippet of HTML code that allows us to monitor our story’s traffic on your site. If you utilize our “Republish” link, the code will be automatically appended at the end of the article. It occupies minimal space and will be enclosed within a standard <script> tag.
- You must set the canonical link to the original Harvard Public Health URL or otherwise ensure that canonical tags are properly implemented to indicate that HPH is the original source of the content. For more information about canonical metadata, click here.
Packaging: Feel free to use our headline and deck or to craft your own headlines, subheads, and other material.
Art: You may republish editorial cartoons and photographs on stories with the “Republish” button. For illustrations or articles without the “Republish” button, please reach out to republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.
Exceptions: Stories that do not include a Republish button are either exclusive to us or governed by another collaborative agreement. Please reach out directly to the author, photographer, illustrator, or other named contributor for permission to reprint work that does not include our Republish button. Please do the same for stories published more than 90 days previously. If you have any questions, contact us at republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.
Translations: If you would like to translate our story into another language, please contact us first at republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.
Ads: It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads, but not ads specifically sold against our stories. You can’t state or imply that donations to your organization support Harvard Public Health.
Responsibilities and restrictions: You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third-party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. Harvard Public Health recognizes that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties aggregate or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
You may not republish our material wholesale or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You may not use our work to populate a website designed to improve rankings on search engines or solely to gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
Any website on which our stories appear must include a prominent and effective way to contact the editorial team at the publication.
Social media: If your publication shares republished stories on social media, we welcome a tag. We are @PublicHealthMag on X, Threads, and Instagram, and Harvard Public Health magazine on Facebook and LinkedIn.
Questions: If you have other questions, email us at republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.