![Book cover: "What if we get it right? Visions of Climate Futures" by Ayana Elizabeth Johnson on a green background](https://harvardpublichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/HarvardPublicHealth_ClimateFutures_v.jpg)
Book
Hope as a catalyst for change in Climate Futures
Imagine a world where hope for healing the planet fuels action. Public health and climate solutions are two sides of the same coin, and people work within their communities to address climate challenges. In What If We Get It Right? Visions of Climate Futures, Ayana Elizabeth Johnson envisions such a world and gives readers a blueprint to achieve it. Packed with hard truths, visionary ideas, and a call to reimagine how we care for our planet and each other, this book is not just an inspiring read—it’s a rallying cry.
The book has been lauded for its refreshing optimism. Johnson, a marine biologist, draws on her experiences as a Black woman, her research on coral reef ecosystems, overfishing, and marine biodiversity, and her contributions to international climate policy to craft a deeply inclusive narrative. She largely succeeds at an ambitious task: broadening the conversation about climate beyond science and technology to include environmental justice, culture, and public health. Her writing is engaging, accessible, and often urgent, blending research with real-world examples and community voices.
The book’s greatest strength lies in how Johnson makes responding to climate change available to everyone. Rather than presenting a rigid set of solutions, she offers a framework for thinking about climate response as a set of systemic changes rather than isolated interventions. When she does propose solutions, they are often practical, if currently underutilized. The approach she offers, as much as the connections between climate and health that she illuminates, makes the book essential reading for public health professionals grappling with the multifaceted challenges of climate change.
Climate action, she writes in a deeply personal introduction, is not an abstract endeavor but a tangible necessity for the lives and well-being of communities worldwide. “We are not separate from the systems we aim to protect; we are part of them.”
Johnson challenges readers to redefine hope as “a propellant,” driving a commitment to act, rather than a passive sentiment.
For example, ocean conservation isn’t just about preserving ecosystems. It’s about safeguarding cultural heritage, livelihoods, and ways of life that are vital to community health. Vivid examples throughout the book illustrate how ecological degradation directly threatens human health, particularly in vulnerable populations who depend on marine resources for nutrition and economic stability. Overgrown reefs left behind by vanishing urchins, she writes, are smothered by unchecked algal growth, reducing fish populations that coastal communities rely on for protein.
Further, she observes, racial disparities in the United States point to a pattern of exclusion of Black people and other marginalized communities from decisions that affect their lives and health. These communities are disproportionately vulnerable to rising seas and flooding. Getting it right means ensuring that their voices and their interests are included in the response.
Her critique of the systemic roots of climate and health inequities will not surprise readers who are familiar with the structural determinants of health. For example, she writes that by popularizing the carbon footprint, fossil fuel companies have shifted blame for greenhouse gas emissions to individuals and diverted attention from industrial-scale emissions as the primary driver of global warming. These emissions are linked to public health crises, including respiratory and cardiovascular disease, along with climate-driven health inequities. Extreme heat, food insecurity, and displacement from housing due to environmental conditions affect marginalized communities disproportionately. Toxic pollution, including microplastics and chemical runoff, infiltrates food systems and water supplies and endangers human health.
Some of her proposed solutions will be familiar to readers who follow political debates about climate change, as will her call for policymakers, public health institutions, and activists to step up. She wants to see more regulation of fossil fuel industries and more enforcement of corporate responsibility. But she also emphasizes grassroots action, advocating for community-led health and environmental justice efforts.
Public health practitioners will find the chapter titled “Disasterology” especially compelling. Extreme weather due to climate change has intensified natural disasters such as hurricanes and wildfires. Johnson critiques the “limited intervention model” of disaster recovery in the United States, which she observes leaves marginalized communities to navigate complex aid systems with little government support. Having made the diagnosis, Johnson advocates for reforms such as fully funding local emergency management departments, improving flood insurance policies, and shifting to community-led disaster preparedness. These proposals, though seemingly straightforward, challenge entrenched bureaucratic structures and could transform how public health systems integrate disaster readiness.
Johnson also stresses the effectiveness of community-led solutions, pointing to grassroots and mutual aid networks that have proven essential in disaster response and recovery. For public health practitioners, this insight is particularly valuable: It underscores how localized responses can improve health equity and why investments in community resilience are essential for mitigating the long-term health impacts of climate-related disasters. Her analysis serves as a compelling call for public health to engage not only in emergency response but also in structural policy advocacy and equitable preparedness planning.
In the concluding section, “Transformation,” Johnson challenges readers to redefine hope as “a propellant”—driving a commitment to act—rather than a passive sentiment. A better world is in reach through what she calls “leaderful” movements—where leadership is distributed across society. “We need many leaders to accelerate the transformation from an extractive economy to a regenerative one,” she writes, emphasizing the importance of collective action over individuals or communities acting alone.
Her call to action—a “Climate Oath”—asks readers to consider their ethical responsibility to integrate climate justice into their practices. She is inspired by this key part of the Hippocratic Oath: “I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.”
Because the book largely focuses on the United States, it may have limited relevance for a global audience. For example, she does not deeply explore how low- and middle-income countries are navigating climate-related health challenges or how global health partnerships could be leveraged to do so.
But Johnson achieves her primary goal. She broadens readers’ perspectives beyond a narrow, science-driven view of climate solutions. By framing climate action as a pathway to healthier, more equitable communities, she makes it possible to stop fixating on averting disaster. Her work is not just a roadmap but an invitation to see climate action as deeply interconnected with social transformation.
Book cover: One World
Republish this article
<p>How public health can move from doomscrolling to action</p>
<p>Written by Paul Adepoju</p>
<p>This <a rel="canonical" href="https://harvardpublichealth.org/environmental-health/climate-solutions-need-hope-as-a-catalyst-ayana-johnson-says/">article</a> originally appeared in <a href="https://harvardpublichealth.org/">Harvard Public Health magazine</a>. Subscribe to their <a href="https://harvardpublichealth.org/subscribe/">newsletter</a>.</p>
<p class="has-drop-cap">Imagine a world where hope for healing the planet fuels action. Public health and climate solutions are two sides of the same coin, and people work within their communities to address climate challenges. In <em>What If We Get It Right?</em> <em>Visions of Climate Futures</em>, Ayana Elizabeth Johnson envisions such a world and gives readers a blueprint to achieve it. Packed with hard truths, visionary ideas, and a call to reimagine how we care for our planet and each other, this book is not just an inspiring read—it’s a rallying cry.</p>
<p>The book has been lauded for its refreshing optimism. Johnson, a marine biologist, draws on her experiences as a Black woman, her research on coral reef ecosystems, overfishing, and marine biodiversity, and her contributions to international climate policy to craft a deeply inclusive narrative. She largely succeeds at an ambitious task: broadening the conversation about climate beyond science and technology to include environmental justice, culture, and public health. Her writing is engaging, accessible, and often urgent, blending research with real-world examples and community voices.</p>
<p>The book’s greatest strength lies in how Johnson makes responding to climate change available to everyone. Rather than presenting a rigid set of solutions, she offers a framework for thinking about climate response as a set of systemic changes rather than isolated interventions. When she does propose solutions, they are often practical, if currently underutilized. The approach she offers, as much as the connections between climate and health that she illuminates, makes the book essential reading for public health professionals grappling with the multifaceted challenges of climate change.</p>
<p>Climate action, she writes in a deeply personal introduction, is not an abstract endeavor but a tangible necessity for the lives and well-being of communities worldwide. “We are not separate from the systems we aim to protect; we are part of them.”</p>
<figure class="wp-block-pullquote alignwide"><blockquote><p>Johnson challenges readers to redefine hope as “a propellant,” driving a commitment to act, rather than a passive sentiment.</p></blockquote></figure>
<p>For example, ocean conservation isn’t just about preserving ecosystems. It’s about safeguarding cultural heritage, livelihoods, and ways of life that are vital to community health. Vivid examples throughout the book illustrate how ecological degradation directly threatens human health, particularly in vulnerable populations who depend on marine resources for nutrition and economic stability. Overgrown reefs left behind by vanishing urchins, she writes, are smothered by unchecked algal growth, reducing fish populations that coastal communities rely on for protein.</p>
<p>Further, she observes, racial disparities in the United States point to a pattern of exclusion of Black people and other marginalized communities from decisions that affect their lives and health. These communities are disproportionately vulnerable to rising seas and flooding. Getting it right means ensuring that their voices and their interests are included in the response.</p>
<p>Her critique of the systemic roots of climate and health inequities will not surprise readers who are familiar with the structural determinants of health. For example, she writes that by popularizing the carbon footprint, fossil fuel companies have shifted blame for greenhouse gas emissions to individuals and diverted attention from industrial-scale emissions as the primary driver of global warming. These emissions are linked to public health crises, including respiratory and cardiovascular disease, along with climate-driven health inequities. Extreme heat, food insecurity, and displacement from housing due to environmental conditions affect marginalized communities disproportionately. Toxic pollution, including microplastics and chemical runoff, infiltrates food systems and water supplies and endangers human health.</p>
<p>Some of her proposed solutions will be familiar to readers who follow political debates about climate change, as will her call for policymakers, public health institutions, and activists to step up. She wants to see more regulation of fossil fuel industries and more enforcement of corporate responsibility. But she also emphasizes grassroots action, advocating for community-led health and environmental justice efforts.</p>
<p>Public health practitioners will find the chapter titled “Disasterology”<em> </em>especially compelling<em>. </em>Extreme weather due to climate change has intensified natural disasters such as hurricanes and wildfires. Johnson critiques the “limited intervention model” of disaster recovery in the United States, which she observes leaves marginalized communities to navigate complex aid systems with little government support. Having made the diagnosis, Johnson advocates for reforms such as fully funding local emergency management departments, improving flood insurance policies, and shifting to community-led disaster preparedness. These proposals, though seemingly straightforward, challenge entrenched bureaucratic structures and could transform how public health systems integrate disaster readiness.</p>
<p>Johnson also stresses the effectiveness of community-led solutions, pointing to grassroots and mutual aid networks that have proven essential in disaster response and recovery. For public health practitioners, this insight is particularly valuable: It underscores how localized responses can improve health equity and why investments in community resilience are essential for mitigating the long-term health impacts of climate-related disasters. Her analysis serves as a compelling call for public health to engage not only in emergency response but also in structural policy advocacy and equitable preparedness planning.</p>
<p>In the concluding section, “Transformation,” Johnson challenges readers to redefine hope as “a propellant”—driving a commitment to act—rather than a passive sentiment. A better world is in reach through what she calls “leaderful” movements—where leadership is distributed across society. “We need many leaders to accelerate the transformation from an extractive economy to a regenerative one,” she writes, emphasizing the importance of collective action over individuals or communities acting alone.</p>
<p>Her call to action—a “Climate Oath”—asks readers to consider their ethical responsibility to integrate climate justice into their practices. She is inspired by this key part of the Hippocratic Oath: “I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure.”</p>
<p>Because the book largely focuses on the United States, it may have limited relevance for a global audience. For example, she does not deeply explore how low- and middle-income countries are navigating climate-related health challenges or how global health partnerships could be leveraged to do so.</p>
<p class=" t-has-endmark t-has-endmark">But Johnson achieves her primary goal. She broadens readers’ perspectives beyond a narrow, science-driven view of climate solutions. By framing climate action as a pathway to healthier, more equitable communities, she makes it possible to stop fixating on averting disaster. Her work is not just a roadmap but an invitation to see climate action as deeply interconnected with social transformation.</p>
<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-S1L5BS4DJN"></script>
<script>
window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
if (typeof gtag !== "function") {function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}}
gtag('js', new Date());
gtag('config', 'G-S1L5BS4DJN');
</script>
Republishing guidelines
We’re happy to know you’re interested in republishing one of our stories. Please follow the guidelines below, adapted from other sites, primarily ProPublica’s Steal Our Stories guidelines (we didn’t steal all of its republishing guidelines, but we stole a lot of them). We also borrowed from Undark and KFF Health News.
Timeframe: Most stories and opinion pieces on our site can be republished within 90 days of posting. An article is available for republishing if our “Republish” button appears next to the story. We follow the Creative Commons noncommercial no-derivatives license.
When republishing a Harvard Public Health story, please follow these rules and use the required acknowledgments:
- Do not edit our stories, except to reflect changes in time (for instance, “last week” may replace “yesterday”), make style updates (we use serial commas; you may choose not to), and location (we spell out state names; you may choose not to).
- Include the author’s byline.
- Include text at the top of the story that says, “This article was originally published by Harvard Public Health. You must link the words “Harvard Public Health” to the story’s original/canonical URL.
- You must preserve the links in our stories, including our newsletter sign-up language and link.
- You must use our analytics tag: a single pixel and a snippet of HTML code that allows us to monitor our story’s traffic on your site. If you utilize our “Republish” link, the code will be automatically appended at the end of the article. It occupies minimal space and will be enclosed within a standard <script> tag.
- You must set the canonical link to the original Harvard Public Health URL or otherwise ensure that canonical tags are properly implemented to indicate that HPH is the original source of the content. For more information about canonical metadata, click here.
Packaging: Feel free to use our headline and deck or to craft your own headlines, subheads, and other material.
Art: You may republish editorial cartoons and photographs on stories with the “Republish” button. For illustrations or articles without the “Republish” button, please reach out to republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.
Exceptions: Stories that do not include a Republish button are either exclusive to us or governed by another collaborative agreement. Please reach out directly to the author, photographer, illustrator, or other named contributor for permission to reprint work that does not include our Republish button. Please do the same for stories published more than 90 days previously. If you have any questions, contact us at republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.
Translations: If you would like to translate our story into another language, please contact us first at republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.
Ads: It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads, but not ads specifically sold against our stories. You can’t state or imply that donations to your organization support Harvard Public Health.
Responsibilities and restrictions: You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third-party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. Harvard Public Health recognizes that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties aggregate or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
You may not republish our material wholesale or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You may not use our work to populate a website designed to improve rankings on search engines or solely to gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
Any website on which our stories appear must include a prominent and effective way to contact the editorial team at the publication.
Social media: If your publication shares republished stories on social media, we welcome a tag. We are @PublicHealthMag on X, Threads, and Instagram, and Harvard Public Health magazine on Facebook and LinkedIn.
Questions: If you have other questions, email us at republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.