![Colorful, diverse illustration of healthcare workers, doctors, nurses, and medical staff.](https://harvardpublichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/HarvardPublicHealth_DEI_diversity-in-healthcare_v.jpg)
Opinion
Good health care is rooted in evidence. So is DEI.
Last month, I fulfilled my life’s greatest dream: I walked across the stage at Harvard Medical School, before the beaming smiles and proud cheers of my loved ones, to complete my two-decade-long journey to become Dr. Nolen. I am the first doctor in my family, an accomplishment I know will have an impact on my community, family, and future patients for years to come.
Since I was eight years old, I dreamed of becoming a doctor, but as a Black woman and first-generation student in medicine, I was concerned: The medical school admissions process has been shown to leave students like me on the margins. I sought out pipeline programs like the Summer Health Professions Education Program (SHPEP) and the Health Careers Opportunity Program (HCOP) to find mentorship, community, and financial support. Programs like these have assisted thousands of students like me who otherwise wouldn’t have had access to the socially and financially exclusive field of medicine. These programs keep students’ dreams alive—and they also have the potential to save patient lives.
Sign up for Harvard Public Health
Delivered to your inbox weekly.
Today only 5.7 percent of physicians identify as Black, while Black people make up over 13 percent of the United States population. Similar gaps exist for Indigenous and Latinx populations. These disparities persist despite a rapidly diversifying U.S. population and evidence demonstrating that a diverse physician workforce improves health outcomes. One longitudinal study, for example, found that increasing the number of Black primary care physicians by county leads to a population-level increase in the life expectancy of Black patients. Benefits of racial-ethnic concordance between physician and patient have also been demonstrated in other areas, including vaccine uptake, infant mortality, and willingness to accept preventative care.
These data demonstrate that diversity in medicine helps save lives. It is the evidence-based solution our patients need.
Yet diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in medicine have recently become the target of “anti-woke” attacks. On March 19, Congressman Greg Murphy, who is also a physician, joined up with an anti-DEI coalition of health professionals and introduced the EDUCATE Act. The bill would gut federal funding for medical institutions that engage with critical aspects of the DEI mission— including pushing students to understand the sociopolitical causes of medical illnesses, studying how health provider biases impact medical care, and implementing pipeline programs and financial initiatives to support students underrepresented in medicine.
Threats against DEI in medicine exist within the field too. Earlier this year, the American Academy of Dermatology rejected a resolution that aimed to end the academy’s DEI programs—despite well-documented evidence of racial disparities in skin-related health outcomes and the dearth of diversity in the field of dermatology. Though the resolution was rejected, the messaging portrays DEI as a danger to medicine—a mainstream argument that is becoming a focal point of national debate.
The banning of DEI practices in medicine would be detrimental. Evidence demonstrates medical trainees still hold racist beliefs, such as Black patients having thicker skin or less sensitive nerve endings compared to White patients. In clinical practice, Black patients are less likely to receive pain medication, be allowed to perform a vaginal delivery, or be listed for a kidney transplant because of false ideas about race. These ideals pervade medical education, and DEI policies seek to rectify these false notions through evidence-based educational reform that has the potential to save patient lives.
Medicine and public health have historically been lauded as evidence-based disciplines. We use data and studies to help determine best practices for clinical care and population interventions. Evidence shows that Black, Latinx, and Indigenous peoples in the United States are more likely to live with or die from nearly every illness, whether it’s heart disease or COVID-19. Finding solutions to address these stubborn racial health disparities has long troubled health practitioners. While DEI policies aren’t a panacea, they offer a starting point to help solve them.
Persistent racial health disparities present a major challenge for both the physical and financial well-being of our nation. To address this challenge, we must acknowledge the evidence-based solutions DEI initiatives offer and combat efforts to dismantle them. We must follow the lead of organizations like the National Medical Association and the Association of American Medical Colleges and double down on our commitment to diversify the health care workforce and prepare the next generation of healers to provide structurally competent care to patients from all backgrounds. These policies will ensure we make careers in medicine and public health accessible to all students. Then they, too, can fulfill their dreams—and the people they eventually serve can have better chances at living healthy lives.
Image: The Izel Art / Adobe Stock
![LaShyra_Nolen_Headshot](https://harvardpublichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/LaShyra_Nolen_Headshot.jpg)
Republish this article
<p>Outcomes improve when patients see doctors who look like them.</p>
<p>Written by LaShyra Nolen</p>
<p>This <a rel="canonical" href="https://harvardpublichealth.org/equity/diversity-in-healthcare-is-good-for-physicians-and-patients-alike/">article</a> originally appeared in<a href="https://harvardpublichealth.org/">Harvard Public Health magazine</a>. Subscribe to their <a href="https://harvardpublichealth.org/subscribe/">newsletter</a>.</p>
<p class="has-drop-cap">Last month, I fulfilled my life’s greatest dream: I walked across the stage at Harvard Medical School, before the beaming smiles and proud cheers of my loved ones, to complete my two-decade-long journey to become Dr. Nolen. I am the first doctor in my family, an accomplishment I know will have an impact on my community, family, and future patients for years to come.</p>
<p>Since I was eight years old, I dreamed of becoming a doctor, but as a Black woman and first-generation student in medicine, I was concerned: The medical school admissions process has been <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama-health-forum/fullarticle/2803727" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">shown</a> to leave students like me on the margins. I sought out pipeline programs like the <a href="https://www.shpep.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Summer Health Professions Education Program (SHPEP)</a> and the <a href="https://health.uconn.edu/hcop/">Health Careers Opportunity Program (HCOP)</a> to find mentorship, community, and financial support. Programs like these have assisted thousands of students like me who otherwise wouldn’t have had access to the socially and financially <a href="https://health.uconn.edu/hcop/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">exclusive</a> field of medicine. These programs keep students’ dreams alive—and they also have the potential to save patient lives.</p>
<p>Today only <a href="https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/data/active-physicians-black-african-american-2021" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">5.7 percent</a> of physicians identify as Black, while Black people make up over 13 percent of the United States population. <a href="https://www.aamc.org/data-reports/workforce/data/figure-18-percentage-all-active-physicians-race/ethnicity-2018" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Similar</a> gaps exist for Indigenous and Latinx populations. These disparities persist despite a rapidly <a href="https://www.brookings.edu/articles/new-census-data-shows-the-nation-is-diversifying-even-faster-than-predicted/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">diversifying</a> U.S. population and evidence demonstrating that a diverse physician workforce improves health outcomes. <a href="https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2803898" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">One longitudinal study</a>, for example, found that increasing the number of Black primary care physicians by county leads to a population-level increase in the life expectancy of Black patients. Benefits of racial-ethnic concordance between physician and patient have also been demonstrated in other areas, including <a href="https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/m20-6141" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">vaccine uptake</a>,<a href="https://fsi.stanford.edu/news/more-african-american-doctors-would-lead-better-outcomes-black-men"> </a> <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32817561/#:~:text=We%2520find%2520no%2520significant%2520improvement,care%253B%2520mortality%253B%2520racial%2520bias." target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">infant mortality</a>, and <a href="https://fsi.stanford.edu/news/more-african-american-doctors-would-lead-better-outcomes-black-men" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">willingness to accept</a> preventative care.</p>
<p>These data demonstrate that diversity in medicine helps save lives. It is the evidence-based solution our patients need.</p>
<p>Yet diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts in medicine have recently become the target of “anti-woke” attacks. On March 19, Congressman Greg Murphy, who is also a physician, joined up with an <a href="https://donoharmmedicine.org/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">anti-DEI coalition of health professionals</a> and introduced the <a href="https://murphy.house.gov/media/press-releases/murphy-introduces-bill-ban-dei-medicine" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">EDUCATE Act</a>. The bill would gut federal funding for medical institutions that engage with critical aspects of the DEI mission— including pushing students to understand the sociopolitical causes of medical illnesses, studying how health provider biases impact medical care, and implementing pipeline programs and financial initiatives to support students underrepresented in medicine.</p>
<p>Threats against DEI in medicine exist <a href="https://journals.plos.org/globalpublichealth/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgph.0003131" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">within the field</a> too. Earlier this year, the American Academy of Dermatology rejected a <a href="https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/anti-dei-proposal-rejected-american-academy-dermatology-rcna142494" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">resolution</a> that aimed to end the academy’s DEI programs—despite well-documented <a href="https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp1915891" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">evidence</a> of racial disparities in skin-related health outcomes and the <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32563342/#:~:text=Dermatology%2520is%2520currently%2520the%2520second,underrepresented%2520in%2520medicine%2520(UIM)." target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">dearth of diversity</a> in the field of dermatology. Though the resolution was rejected, the messaging portrays DEI as a danger to medicine—a mainstream argument that is becoming a focal point of <a href="https://www.foxbusiness.com/media/elon-musk-clashes-don-lemon-dei-lowering-medical-standards-people-die" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">national debate</a>.</p>
<p>The banning of DEI practices in medicine would be detrimental. Evidence demonstrates medical trainees still hold racist beliefs, such as Black patients having thicker skin or <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4843483/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">less sensitive nerve endings</a> compared to White patients. In clinical practice, Black patients are less likely to receive <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35534768/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">pain medication</a>, be allowed to perform a <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35534768/">vaginal delivery</a>, or be listed for a <a href="https://www.inquirer.com/health/kidney-transplants-race-variable-medical-racism-jefferson-philadelphia-20230611.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">kidney transplant</a> because of false ideas about race. These ideals pervade medical education, and DEI policies seek to rectify these false notions through evidence-based educational reform that has the potential to save patient lives.</p>
<p>Medicine and public health have historically been lauded as evidence-based disciplines. We use data and studies to help determine best practices for clinical care and population interventions. Evidence shows that Black, Latinx, and Indigenous peoples in the United States are more likely to live with or die from nearly every <a href="https://www.cdc.gov/minorityhealth/racism-disparities/impact-of-racism.html" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">illness</a>, whether it’s heart disease or COVID-19. Finding solutions to address these <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25032386/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">stubborn racial health disparities</a> has long troubled health practitioners. While DEI policies aren’t a panacea, they offer a starting point to help solve them.</p>
<p class=" t-has-endmark t-has-endmark">Persistent racial health disparities present a major challenge for both the physical and <a href="https://www.bluecrossmafoundation.org/press/59-billion-case-massachusetts-health-equity-reform-press-release#:~:text=Researchers%20estimated%20the%20annual%20economic,health%2C%20and%20the%20cost%20of" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">financial well-being</a> of our nation. To address this challenge, we must acknowledge the evidence-based solutions DEI initiatives offer and combat efforts to dismantle them. We must follow the lead of organizations like the <a href="https://www.nmanet.org/news/667985/The-NMA-Advocates-for-DEI-in-Medicine.htm?fbclid=IwAR07GBRDNjVBJLU67Yj1GQ5emdDe0OPbdsATvoiHzfKGxA2A_BxZJrBejks" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">National Medical Association</a> and the <a href="https://www.aamc.org/advocacy-policy/washington-highlights/educate-act-introduced-rep-greg-murphy-md" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Association of American Medical Colleges</a> and double down on our commitment to diversify the health care workforce and prepare the next generation of healers to provide <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4269606/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">structurally competent care</a> to patients from all backgrounds. These policies will ensure we make careers in medicine and public health accessible to all students. Then they, too, can fulfill their dreams—and the people they eventually serve can have better chances at living healthy lives.</p>
<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-S1L5BS4DJN"></script>
<script>
window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
if (typeof gtag !== "function") {function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}}
gtag('js', new Date());
gtag('config', 'G-S1L5BS4DJN');
</script>
Republishing guidelines
We’re happy to know you’re interested in republishing one of our stories. Please follow the guidelines below, adapted from other sites, primarily ProPublica’s Steal Our Stories guidelines (we didn’t steal all of its republishing guidelines, but we stole a lot of them). We also borrowed from Undark and KFF Health News.
Timeframe: Most stories and opinion pieces on our site can be republished within 90 days of posting. An article is available for republishing if our “Republish” button appears next to the story. We follow the Creative Commons noncommercial no-derivatives license.
When republishing a Harvard Public Health story, please follow these rules and use the required acknowledgments:
- Do not edit our stories, except to reflect changes in time (for instance, “last week” may replace “yesterday”), make style updates (we use serial commas; you may choose not to), and location (we spell out state names; you may choose not to).
- Include the author’s byline.
- Include text at the top of the story that says, “This article was originally published by Harvard Public Health. You must link the words “Harvard Public Health” to the story’s original/canonical URL.
- You must preserve the links in our stories, including our newsletter sign-up language and link.
- You must use our analytics tag: a single pixel and a snippet of HTML code that allows us to monitor our story’s traffic on your site. If you utilize our “Republish” link, the code will be automatically appended at the end of the article. It occupies minimal space and will be enclosed within a standard <script> tag.
- You must set the canonical link to the original Harvard Public Health URL or otherwise ensure that canonical tags are properly implemented to indicate that HPH is the original source of the content. For more information about canonical metadata, click here.
Packaging: Feel free to use our headline and deck or to craft your own headlines, subheads, and other material.
Art: You may republish editorial cartoons and photographs on stories with the “Republish” button. For illustrations or articles without the “Republish” button, please reach out to republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.
Exceptions: Stories that do not include a Republish button are either exclusive to us or governed by another collaborative agreement. Please reach out directly to the author, photographer, illustrator, or other named contributor for permission to reprint work that does not include our Republish button. Please do the same for stories published more than 90 days previously. If you have any questions, contact us at republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.
Translations: If you would like to translate our story into another language, please contact us first at republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.
Ads: It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads, but not ads specifically sold against our stories. You can’t state or imply that donations to your organization support Harvard Public Health.
Responsibilities and restrictions: You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third-party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. Harvard Public Health recognizes that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties aggregate or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
You may not republish our material wholesale or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You may not use our work to populate a website designed to improve rankings on search engines or solely to gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
Any website on which our stories appear must include a prominent and effective way to contact the editorial team at the publication.
Social media: If your publication shares republished stories on social media, we welcome a tag. We are @PublicHealthMag on X, Threads, and Instagram, and Harvard Public Health magazine on Facebook and LinkedIn.
Questions: If you have other questions, email us at republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.