Feature
Palliative care could be a game changer for public health
“Being ill is like a full-time job,” says Andrew E. Kaufman, a 60-year-old author. Kaufman lives with myasthenia gravis, a neuromuscular disease, as well as other chronic conditions, and his self-care requires a lot of time—and communication. The cascade of his own needs “is frustrating and causes anxiety and a whole host of issues.”
Lucky for Kaufman, he lives in California, where he has help from a palliative care team. California is one of the first states in the country to require insurance companies that administer Medicaid benefits to fully cover palliative care services for eligible residents. Kaufman’s team, which is covered by Blue Shield of California, includes a social worker, a care coordinator (who is also a nurse), and a nurse practitioner, most of whom he is in touch with on a regular basis. They monitor his blood pressure and oxygen levels and assist with administrative tasks such as phone calls and emails to medical providers, which can be time-consuming and stressful.
This range of services isn’t what most people think of when they hear the phrase “palliative care.” Often misunderstood as end-of-life care, palliative care is often called a “constellation of services” that vary with the needs of the patient, not the prognosis.
“It’s … flexible based on individual needs [and] not concentrated on being in the hospital,” explains Kimberly Bower, a family physician and senior medical director of Blue Shield of California Promise Health Plan.
Sign up for Harvard Public Health
Delivered to your inbox weekly.
Approximately 150 million people in the U.S. have a chronic health condition, and two-thirds of those have two or more such conditions. Palliative care can offer them crucial support. When people are living with more than one chronic condition or serious illness, the health care system becomes a quagmire. “People in medicine tend to focus on the one organ system that they’re responsible for,” Bower says. “When you build a palliative care team that’s interdisciplinary, that team becomes this nice navigator of the health care system and the social safety net.”
A growing body of research shows that this form of care reduces physical discomfort and stress, improves quality of life for individuals and their families, and helps people stay at home rather than having to go to an emergency room. A 2010 study of patients living with advanced lung cancer, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, found that early palliative care improved their quality of life and mood. People who get early palliative care also received less aggressive treatment at the end of life—and lived longer.
A study published in The Lancet in 2014 found that patients with advanced cancer who took part in early palliative care were more satisfied with their care; they also reported improved quality of life and symptom management. And a 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis published in JAMA found that adults with noncancerous chronic illness who received palliative care experienced a lower symptom burden and had fewer emergency department visits and hospitalizations.
Palliative care can also save money. The National Academy for State Health Policy estimates that states with comprehensive palliative care benefits for Medicaid users can expect to see cost savings of up to $1,165 per member per month, thanks to reduced utilization of inpatient services and emergency department visits. “It’s cheaper to send someone to your house than to send you to a hospital,” says Marian Grant, a senior regulatory advisor with the Coalition to Transform Advanced Care (C-TAC).
Palliative care is poised to be a game changer for public health. Nearly 50 percent of states now include palliative care services for eligible Medicaid recipients, according to C-TAC. And in California and Hawaii, two paths are being forged toward wider palliative care access.
The California model changes who pays for palliative care
In 2014, California passed legislation requiring that eligible Medicaid beneficiaries receive access to palliative care. Kate Meyers, a senior program officer at the California Health Care Foundation, said the change created a first-of-its-kind payment model that other states learned from.
California’s dedication to palliative care dates back nearly two decades. In 2006, lawmakers required the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to create a pediatric palliative care model that would enable eligible children and their families to receive in-home palliative care throughout a child’s illness. The new measure came about thanks in part to statewide philanthropic groups.
In 2014, the state expanded its commitment with a law that paved the way for coverage of palliative services by Medi-Cal, the state’s Medicaid agency. The list of qualifying health conditions was short—advanced cancer, congestive heart failure, COPD, and liver disease—but the possibility picked up steam. Even before the law went into effect, the private health insurer Blue Shield of California developed a palliative care coverage model for the 1.5 million members of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System receiving health coverage.
“The thinking was, it’s really going to be a benefit across all lines of CalPERS [state retirement system]; let’s go ahead and offer this,” says Bower, with Blue Shield of California. Today, Blue Shield of California covers palliative care with commercial and Medicare Advantage plans, which together cover 4.8 million members, and includes neurological and cerebral vascular diseases as eligible criteria.
More than 4,800 Blue Shield of California members have utilized palliative care services since 2018. Patient satisfaction surveys indicate that members appreciate and like the palliative care program, but Blue Shield of California also measures other data points, including quality of care. Blue Shield of California says the rate of hospital and emergency department utilization for members with palliative care services has decreased because the health care team is more aggressively managing symptoms.
Hawaii develops a model beyond palliative care vs. hospice
Hawaii, meanwhile, is pioneering palliative care as a preventive service, tackling regulatory battles and reimbursement hurdles to list palliative care services in state Medicaid benefits. “Palliative care is a preventive service,” says Torrie Fields, whose consulting firm, TF & Associates, worked with Hawaii on its State Plan Amendment. “It doesn’t just save money; it actually prevents suffering.” Fields’ firm also worked with the state’s Medicaid agency, Med-QUEST Division, to develop and file a comprehensive palliative care benefit for Medicaid beneficiaries facing a serious illness.
Hawaii is currently waiting for approval from the national Centers for Medicaid and CHIP Services (CMCS), which oversees rules for expanding Medicaid benefits. If approved, Hawaii would set a precedent for other states seeking to cover palliative care services.
Who pays for palliative care is only one piece of the puzzle
But for all the creativity and tenacity of these new moves, there are still obstacles to wider palliative care coverage nationally. Developing and standardizing education and clinical training is also necessary for accelerating access to palliative care. Not all clinicians are going back to school to get a fellowship in palliative care, Fields says. “Providers [need] to start using evidence-based guidelines and certification standards to standardize the care they deliver for the entire population that they see,” says Fields. Standardization ensures both that providers can be reimbursed and that patients receive the same services across insurance and provider networks. “The hope and the need is for provider organizations to start delivering things that are relatively similar to one another so people understand what palliative care services are and can start to expect that of the system.”
If nothing changes, that system will face increasing strain. As baby boomers age, the number of people living with serious illnesses is expected to increase exponentially in the coming decades. Experts estimate that, for populous states, the kind of cost savings palliative care can capture could translate into hundreds of millions of dollars a year. And policymakers are beginning to pay attention: 24 states have established palliative care advisory councils or other advisory groups.
Even with policy changes, public knowledge remains a hurdle, according to Fields. Palliative care services are not yet a standard part of health care, and there are gaps among which services insurance providers pay for. “We need people and caregivers to know this is not what they are receiving today,” she says. Without the crucial piece of patient education, she says, “coverage [alone] does not equal access.”
Republish this article
<p>California and Hawaii are pioneering ways to expand access.</p>
<p>Written by Meredith Lidard Kleeman</p>
<p>This <a rel="canonical" href="https://harvardpublichealth.org/policy-practice/who-pays-for-palliative-care-and-why-we-need-to-change-that/">article</a> originally appeared in<a href="https://harvardpublichealth.org/">Harvard Public Health magazine</a>. Subscribe to their <a href="https://harvardpublichealth.org/subscribe/">newsletter</a>.</p>
<p class="has-drop-cap is-style-default">“Being ill is like a full-time job,” says Andrew E. Kaufman, a 60-year-old author. Kaufman lives with myasthenia gravis, a neuromuscular disease, as well as other chronic conditions, and his self-care requires a lot of time—and communication. The cascade of his own needs “is frustrating and causes anxiety and a whole host of issues.”</p>
<p>Lucky for Kaufman, he lives in California, where he has help from a palliative care team. California is one of the first states in the country to require insurance companies that administer <a href="https://harvardpublichealth.org/policy-practice/medi-cal-for-undocumented-immigrants-who-is-covered/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Medicaid benefits</a> to fully cover palliative care services for eligible residents. Kaufman’s team, which is covered by Blue Shield of California, includes a social worker, a care coordinator (who is also a nurse), and a nurse practitioner, most of whom he is in touch with on a regular basis. They monitor his blood pressure and oxygen levels and assist with administrative tasks such as phone calls and emails to medical providers, which can be time-consuming and stressful.</p>
<p>This range of services isn’t what most people think of when they hear the phrase “palliative care.” Often misunderstood as end-of-life care, palliative care is often called a <a href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1955268/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">“constellation of services”</a> that vary with the needs of the patient, not the prognosis.</p>
<p>“It’s … flexible based on individual needs [and] not concentrated on being in the hospital,” explains <a href="https://coalitionccc.org/CCCC/CCCC/About/Board-of-Directors-2023.aspx" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Kimberly Bower</a>, a family physician and senior medical director of Blue Shield of California Promise Health Plan.</p>
<p>Approximately 150 million people in the U.S. have a chronic health condition, and two-thirds of those have two or more such conditions. Palliative care can offer them crucial support. When people are living with more than one chronic condition or serious illness, the health care system becomes a quagmire. “People in medicine tend to focus on the one organ system that they’re responsible for,” Bower says. “When you build a palliative care team that’s interdisciplinary, that team becomes this nice navigator of the health care system and the social safety net.”</p>
<p>A growing body of research shows that this form of care reduces physical discomfort and stress, improves quality of life for individuals and their families, and helps people stay at home rather than having to go to an emergency room. A <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20818875/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2010 study</a> of patients living with advanced lung cancer, published in the <em>New England Journal of Medicine</em>, found that early palliative care improved their quality of life and mood. People who get early palliative care also received less aggressive treatment at the end of life—and lived longer.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(13)62416-2/abstract" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">A study</a> published in <em>The Lancet </em>in 2014 found that patients with advanced cancer who took part in early palliative care were more satisfied with their care; they also reported improved quality of life and symptom management. And a 2020 systematic review and meta-analysis published in <em>JAMA </em>found that adults with noncancerous chronic illness who received palliative care experienced a lower symptom burden and had fewer emergency department visits and hospitalizations.</p>
<p>Palliative care can also save money. <a href="https://nashp.org/palliative-care-in-medicaid-costing-out-the-benefit-actuarial-analysis-of-medicaid-experience/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The National Academy for State Health Policy</a> estimates that states with comprehensive palliative care benefits for Medicaid users can expect to see cost savings of up to $1,165 per member per month, thanks to reduced utilization of inpatient services and emergency department visits. “It’s cheaper to send someone to your house than to send you to a hospital,” says Marian Grant, a senior regulatory advisor with the Coalition to Transform Advanced Care (C-TAC).</p>
<p>Palliative care is poised to be a game changer for public health. Nearly 50 percent of states now include palliative care services for eligible Medicaid recipients, according to C-TAC. And in California and Hawaii, two paths are being forged toward wider palliative care access.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-the-california-model-changes-who-pays-for-palliative-care">The California model changes who pays for palliative care</h2>
<p>In 2014, California passed legislation requiring that eligible Medicaid beneficiaries receive access to palliative care. Kate Meyers, a senior program officer at the California Health Care Foundation, said the change created a first-of-its-kind payment model that other states learned from.</p>
<p>California’s dedication to palliative care dates back nearly two decades. In 2006, lawmakers required the California Department of Health Care Services (DHCS) to create a pediatric palliative care model that would enable eligible children and their families to receive in-home palliative care throughout a child’s illness. The new measure came about thanks in part to statewide philanthropic groups.</p>
<p>In 2014, the state expanded its commitment with a law that paved the way for coverage of palliative services by Medi-Cal, the state’s Medicaid agency. The list of qualifying health conditions was short—advanced cancer, congestive heart failure, COPD, and liver disease—but the possibility picked up steam. Even before the law went into effect, the private health insurer Blue Shield of California developed a palliative care coverage model for the 1.5 million members of the California Public Employees’ Retirement System receiving health coverage.</p>
<p>“The thinking was, it’s really going to be a benefit across all lines of <a href="https://www.calpers.ca.gov/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">CalPERS</a> [state retirement system]; let’s go ahead and offer this,” says Bower, with Blue Shield of California. Today, Blue Shield of California covers palliative care with commercial and Medicare Advantage plans, which together cover 4.8 million members, and includes neurological and cerebral vascular diseases as eligible criteria.</p>
<p>More than 4,800 Blue Shield of California members have utilized palliative care services since 2018. Patient satisfaction surveys indicate that members appreciate and like the palliative care program, but Blue Shield of California also measures other data points, including quality of care. Blue Shield of California says the rate of hospital and emergency department utilization for members with palliative care services has decreased because the health care team is more aggressively managing symptoms.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-hawaii-develops-a-model-beyond-palliative-care-vs-hospice">Hawaii develops a model beyond palliative care vs. hospice</h2>
<p>Hawaii, meanwhile, is pioneering palliative care as a preventive service, tackling regulatory battles and reimbursement hurdles to list palliative care services in state Medicaid benefits. “Palliative care is a preventive service,” says Torrie Fields, whose consulting firm, TF & Associates, worked with Hawaii on its State Plan Amendment. “It doesn't just save money; it actually prevents suffering.” Fields’ firm also worked with the state’s Medicaid agency, Med-QUEST Division, to develop and file a comprehensive palliative care benefit for Medicaid beneficiaries facing a serious illness.</p>
<p>Hawaii is currently waiting for approval from the national Centers for Medicaid and CHIP Services (CMCS), which oversees rules for expanding Medicaid benefits. If approved, Hawaii would set a precedent for other states seeking to cover palliative care services.</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading" id="h-who-pays-for-palliative-care-is-only-one-piece-of-the-puzzle">Who pays for palliative care is only one piece of the puzzle</h2>
<p>But for all the creativity and tenacity of these new moves, there are still obstacles to wider palliative care coverage nationally. Developing and standardizing education and clinical training is also necessary for accelerating access to palliative care. Not all clinicians are going back to school to get a fellowship in palliative care, Fields says. “Providers [need] to start using evidence-based guidelines and certification standards to standardize the care they deliver for the entire population that they see,” says Fields. Standardization ensures both that providers can be reimbursed and that patients receive the same services across insurance and provider networks. “The hope and the need is for provider organizations to start delivering things that are relatively similar to one another so people understand what palliative care services are and can start to expect that of the system.”</p>
<p>If nothing changes, that system will face increasing strain. As baby boomers age, the number of people living with serious illnesses is expected to increase exponentially in the coming decades. Experts estimate that, for populous states, the kind of cost savings palliative care can capture could translate into hundreds of millions of dollars a year. And policymakers are beginning to pay attention: <a href="https://nashp.org/state-tracker/map-palliative-care-advisory-task-forces/" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">24 states</a> have established palliative care advisory councils or other advisory groups.</p>
<p class=" t-has-endmark t-has-endmark">Even with policy changes, public knowledge remains a hurdle, according to Fields. Palliative care services are not yet a standard part of health care, and there are gaps among which services insurance providers pay for. “We need people and caregivers to know this is not what they are receiving today,” she says. Without the crucial piece of patient education, she says, “coverage [alone] does not equal access.”</p>
<p class="is-style-t-caption">Illustration: Ben S. Wallace</p>
<script async src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-S1L5BS4DJN"></script>
<script>
window.dataLayer = window.dataLayer || [];
if (typeof gtag !== "function") {function gtag(){dataLayer.push(arguments);}}
gtag('js', new Date());
gtag('config', 'G-S1L5BS4DJN');
</script>
Republishing guidelines
We’re happy to know you’re interested in republishing one of our stories. Please follow the guidelines below, adapted from other sites, primarily ProPublica’s Steal Our Stories guidelines (we didn’t steal all of its republishing guidelines, but we stole a lot of them). We also borrowed from Undark and KFF Health News.
Timeframe: Most stories and opinion pieces on our site can be republished within 90 days of posting. An article is available for republishing if our “Republish” button appears next to the story. We follow the Creative Commons noncommercial no-derivatives license.
When republishing a Harvard Public Health story, please follow these rules and use the required acknowledgments:
- Do not edit our stories, except to reflect changes in time (for instance, “last week” may replace “yesterday”), make style updates (we use serial commas; you may choose not to), and location (we spell out state names; you may choose not to).
- Include the author’s byline.
- Include text at the top of the story that says, “This article was originally published by Harvard Public Health. You must link the words “Harvard Public Health” to the story’s original/canonical URL.
- You must preserve the links in our stories, including our newsletter sign-up language and link.
- You must use our analytics tag: a single pixel and a snippet of HTML code that allows us to monitor our story’s traffic on your site. If you utilize our “Republish” link, the code will be automatically appended at the end of the article. It occupies minimal space and will be enclosed within a standard <script> tag.
- You must set the canonical link to the original Harvard Public Health URL or otherwise ensure that canonical tags are properly implemented to indicate that HPH is the original source of the content. For more information about canonical metadata, click here.
Packaging: Feel free to use our headline and deck or to craft your own headlines, subheads, and other material.
Art: You may republish editorial cartoons and photographs on stories with the “Republish” button. For illustrations or articles without the “Republish” button, please reach out to republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.
Exceptions: Stories that do not include a Republish button are either exclusive to us or governed by another collaborative agreement. Please reach out directly to the author, photographer, illustrator, or other named contributor for permission to reprint work that does not include our Republish button. Please do the same for stories published more than 90 days previously. If you have any questions, contact us at republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.
Translations: If you would like to translate our story into another language, please contact us first at republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.
Ads: It’s okay to put our stories on pages with ads, but not ads specifically sold against our stories. You can’t state or imply that donations to your organization support Harvard Public Health.
Responsibilities and restrictions: You have no rights to sell, license, syndicate, or otherwise represent yourself as the authorized owner of our material to any third parties. This means that you cannot actively publish or submit our work for syndication to third-party platforms or apps like Apple News or Google News. Harvard Public Health recognizes that publishers cannot fully control when certain third parties aggregate or crawl content from publishers’ own sites.
You may not republish our material wholesale or automatically; you need to select stories to be republished individually.
You may not use our work to populate a website designed to improve rankings on search engines or solely to gain revenue from network-based advertisements.
Any website on which our stories appear must include a prominent and effective way to contact the editorial team at the publication.
Social media: If your publication shares republished stories on social media, we welcome a tag. We are @PublicHealthMag on X, Threads, and Instagram, and Harvard Public Health magazine on Facebook and LinkedIn.
Questions: If you have other questions, email us at republishing@hsph.harvard.edu.